Legal Studies Class Savers

Published regularly, this column provides a class exercise based on an article published in the Alternative Law Journal. The exercises are prepared by legal studies teachers for secondary legal studies students. Select the Legal Studies column category below to purchase an exercise and its related article in one pdf for AU$9.90 (incl GST).

View an example

2016 Vol 41(4): Social media and unfair dismissal

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Social media and unfair dismissal" by Justin Pen: (2016) 41(4) Alternative Law Journal pp 271-274.

In his article, ‘Never Tweet?’ Social media and unfair dismissal, Justin Pen examines the challenges posed by the increased use of social media for employment law. He considers the extent to which employers can regulate the private behaviour of employees, and the role of law and cultural expectations in striking the right balance.

Price: $9.90

2016 Vol 41(3): Double dissolution and deadlocks

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Double dissolution and deadlocks'' by Oscar Roos and Kelly Green (2016) 41(3) Alternative Law Journal pp 165-168

In their article, Going to a ‘Double D’: The 2016 federal election and the Constitution, Oscar Roos and Kelly Green explain the double dissolution process used to resolve deadlocks between the two houses of the Commonwealth Parliament, and the context of the 2016 federal election.

Price: $9.90

2016 Vol 41(2): Sexual harassment and temporary migrant workers

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Examining a temporary migrant worker’s ability to make a complaint of sexual harassment'' by Joanna Howe (2016) 41(2) Alternative Law Journal pp 102-104

In her article, ‘Examining a temporary migrant worker’s ability to make a complaint of sexual harassment’, Joanna Howe uses a case study to illustrate the challenges facing migrant women who seek the protection of Australia’s legal system. Students should read the article, and then participate in the following activities.

Price: $9.90

2016 Vol 41(1): Safe access zones and protests

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Protests outside abortion clinics: Constitutionally protected speech?'' by Mitchell Landrigan (2016) 41(1) Alternative Law Journal pp 8-12

In Protests outside abortion clinics: Constitutionally protected speech? author Mitchell Landrigan considers whether Victoria’s ‘bubble zone’ legislation would hold up if challenged as a breach of the implied freedom of political communication.

Price: $9.90

2015 Vol 40(4): Animals as property or persons?

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Animals as property or persons?'' by Geeta Shyam (2015) 40(4) Alternative Law Journal pp 266-270

In The Legal Status of Animals, Geeta Shyam surveys global developments in the legal treatment of animals. In particular, she considers their traditional classification as objects to be owned by people, and recent arguments for the recognition of at least some animals as ‘non-human persons’ with their own legal identity and rights. Students should read the article, and then participate in the following activities.

Price: $9.90

2015 Vol 40(3): The Politics of Gender Diversity on the High Court of Australia

Legal studies exercise based on the article "The Politics of Gender Diversity on the High Court of Australia'' by Kcasey McLoughlin (2015) 40(3) Alternative Law Journal pp 166-170

Kcasey McLoughlin’s article, The Politics of Gender Diversity on the High Court of Australia, argues that the concept of ‘merit’ has traditionally been interpreted through a masculine perspective, and that it has been privileged as the primary consideration in the appointment of judges. She argues that diversity is equally important in the judiciary, and that ‘it is entirely possible to implement measures to secure a more diverse judiciary without sacrificing “merit”.’

Price: $9.90

2015 Vol 40(2): Charlie Hebdo and hurtful racist speech

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Words can never hurt me?'' by Amanda Porter (2015) 40(2) Alternative Law Journal pp 86-88

Amanda Porter’s article, ‘Words can never hurt me?’, considers the mass murder of journalists at France’s Charlie Hebdo magazine, as well as the Australian debate about section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth). It provides an international and historical context for anti-vilification laws, and argues that offensive racist speech causes real injuries that should not be lightly ignored.

Price: $9.90

2015 Vol 40(1): Investigating anti-discrimination law

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Making room at the inn: Protecting the expression of sexual identity in anti-discrimination law" by David Glasgow’: (2015) 40(1) Alternative Law Journal pp 9-12.

David Glasgow’s article ‘Making Room at the Inn’ considers the role of anti-discrimination law in protecting the public expression of protected characteristics, especially where those expressions come into conflict. These exercises focus on the nature and extent of anti-discrimination law, and how it addresses conflicting rights.

Price: $9.90

2014 Vol 39(4): Therapeutic jurisprudence in the mainstream

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Therapeutic jurisprudence in the mainstream" by Pauline Spencer: (2014) 39(4) Alternative Law Journal pp 222-226.

Pauline Spencer’s article FROM ALTERNATIVE TO THE NEW NORMAL: Therapeutic jurisprudence in the mainstream argues for the legal philosophy of therapeutic jurisprudence (‘TJ’) because it is humane, just and effective.  The article considers how to apply therapeutic jurisprudence at different points in the justice system, and proposes ways that therapeutic jurisprudence could be bolstered by law reform.

Price: $9.90

2014 Vol 39(3): Convenience voting: The end of election day?

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Convenience voting:
The end of election day?" by Graeme Orr: (2014) 39(3) Alternative Law Journal pp 151-155.

In his article Convenience Voting, author Graeme Orr argues against a shift towards ‘convenience’ voting in western democracies because it threatens the ritual of election day.

Price: $9.90

2014 Vol 39(2): Inside Jill Meagher’s Handbag

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Inside Jill Meagher’s Handbag
Looking at open justice" by Katherine Biber: (2014) 39(2) Alternative Law Journal pp 73-77.

Katherine Biber’s article Inside Jill Meagher’s Handbag explores the principle of ‘open justice’ in the context of evidence and exhibits tendered in criminal proceedings. Biber considers the processes that allow the media and others to access evidence and exhibits in different jurisdictions. She argues that the law in this area should be consistent and clear.

Price: $9.90

2014 Vol 39(1): Queensland, the Moonlight State?

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Queensland, the Moonlight State?" by Kate Galloway and Allan Ardill: (2014) 39(1) Alternative Law Journal pp 3-8.

Kate Galloway and Allan Ardill’s article ‘Queensland: A Return to the Moonlight State?’ considers the latest laws from Queensland that are getting ‘tough on bikies’. The authors outline the evolution of the ‘rule of law’ and argue for its continued importance. They consider the legal and other consequences of criminalising association and expanding police powers. This exercise encourages thinking about these issues and other ways that governments can address organised crime.

Price: $9.90

2013 Vol 38(4): Public interest litigation

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Public Interest Litigation: Making the case in Australia" by Andrea Durbach, Luke McNamara, Simon Rice and Mark Rix: (2013) 38(4) Alternative Law Journal pp 219-223.

Litigation is widely and appropriately recognised as an important component of the public interest advocacy ‘toolkit’. Yet, little attention has been paid in Australian research and scholarship to an important question: under what circumstances is public interest litigation (‘PIL’) an effective way to bring about progressive social change? Informed by a review of the international literature on PIL, the authors of this article argue for the importance of drawing on Australia’s rich history with PIL to develop a solid empirical evidence base which can inform future decisions about the strategic employment of PIL in campaigns to address the concerns and needs of disadvantaged and marginalised sections of Australian society.

Price: $9.90

2013 Vol 38(3): Australian courts and social media

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Australian courts and social media" by Alysia Blackham and George Williams: (2013) 38(3) Alternative Law Journal pp 170-175.

Social media is now pervasive in many sectors of Australian society. However, Australia’s courts are generally taking a cautious approach to using this technology to enhance and complement their processes. This article examines the extent to which Australian courts are using social media. It considers the opportunities and challenges posed by such media for courts, and it assesses the extent to which they could make greater use of the technology. Price: $9.90

2013 Vol 38(2): Cyber bullying in Australian schools

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Cyber bullying in Australian schools" by Amy Dwyer and Patricia Easteal: (2013) 38(2) Alternative Law Journal pp 92-95.

Cyber bullying among school-age children is becoming an increasing problem in Australia. As yet there have been no negligence suits against a school. We speculate on possible outcomes by looking at school bullying cases, workplace bullying and harassment common law. In these ways, we theorise about the application of the principles of negligence and liability, with cyber bullying unique features. These include many of the acts of cyber bullying taking place off school premises; a ‘playing field’ difficult to supervise; low reporting rates and corresponding difficulties in awareness; and ‘damage’ that may prove difficult to ground in negligence. We conclude by making some recommendations for schools, including implementing more anti-bullying policies and programs with effective monitoring and implementation.

Price: $9.90

2013 Vol 38(1): Responsible Government, Federalism And The School Chaplaincy Case

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Responsible Government, Federalism And The School Chaplaincy Case" by Graeme Orr And William Isdale: (2013) 38(1) Alternative Law Journal pp 3-7.

This article analyses the power of the Commonwealth to fund activities in broader society, in the wake of the High Court's recent decision in the School Chaplaincy case of Williams v Commonwealth, and the earlier decision in Pape v Commissioner of Taxation. Although the Court rejected the substantive argument about the separation of church and state, the decision provides significant reflections on the Commonwealth executive's expenditure power. The rhetoric in Williams about federal-state power, and responsible government through parliamentary oversight of expenditure, appears to signal a shift in the Court’s previous positions. But, on its own, will do little in shifting the balance on either issue.

Price: $9.90

2012 Vol 37(4): ‘Fair Shake Of The Sauce Bottle’

Legal studies exercise based on the article "‘FAIR SHAKE OF THE SAUCE BOTTLE’ Fairer ASIO security assessments of refugees" by Ben Saul: (2012) 37(4) Alternative Law Journal pp 221-227.

The security assessment of refugees by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (‘ASIO’) has frequently involved the virtual elimination of procedural fairness and resulted in indefinite detention. Around 54 refugees who arrived since 2009 remained detained by late 2012 after receiving adverse security assessments. Most of them did not receive reasons or evidence, or a summary of reasons or evidence. At most, some were notified of limited matters during interviews by ASIO, but some were not interviewed at all. Binding merits review is entirely unavailable, and the effectiveness of judicial review is severely limited by the difficulty of commencing proceedings in the absence of evidence, by the statutory and common law diminution of procedural fairness, and by the availability of public interest immunity to prevent disclosure of relevant evidence. The High Court decision of M47 in October 2012 did not affect the possibility of marginal procedural fairness or indefinite detention. The creation in October 2012 of an Independent Reviewer of ASIO assessments somewhat improves the fairness of the process but it remains deficient in key respects, not least because the reviewer possesses only powers of recommendation and the new procedure remains insufficiently fair. This article proposes more comprehensive reforms to provide a genuinely fair hearing while protecting security, addressing issues of notice, reasons, degree of disclosure, merits review, a special advocate procedure, periodic review and alternative security measures to detention. It also advances a more ambitious proposal to transfer the power to issue security assessments from ASIO to the courts.

Price: $9.90

2012 Vol 37(3): Removing racism from Australia’s Constitutional DNA

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Removing racism from Australia’s Constitutional DNA " by George Williams: (2012) 37(3) Alternative Law Journal pp 151-155.

This article examines the use of ‘race’ in the Australian Constitution and explores how the concept has played a role from its drafting through to the present day, to determine the changes needed to appropriately recognise Aboriginal peoples in that document.

Price: $9.90

2012 Vol 37(2): Landowners’ vs Miners’ Property Interests

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Landowners’ vs Miners’ Property Interests" by Kate Galloway: (2012) 37(2) Alternative Law Journal pp 77-81.

This article considers competing interests in land of freehold landowners and miners of coal seam gas.  It provides an overview of common law understanding of property in land, and suggests that this framework is unsuitable for resolving directly competing interests.  In addition, it argues that a philosophy of property that embraces a more holistic understanding of land and its stewardship is a more sustainable way to prioritise proprietary interests.

Price: $9.90

2012 Vol 37(1): Bloody Censorship

Legal studies exercise based on the article "Bloody Censorship" by Anthony Gray: (2012) 37(1) Alternative Law Journal pp 37-40.

Recent moves by Parliament to increase penalties for the use of 'obscene' language raise questions about the extent to which individuals have freedom of expression rights in Australia. I argue here that such laws might be challenged on the basis of the implied freedom of political communication developed by the Australian Courts. I look to the experience in other countries such as the United States where courts have upheld an individual's freedom of expression over attempts to regulate what a person can say, and the extent to which freedom of expression is protected in international instruments.

Price: $9.90
Results 1 - 20 of 39
You are here: Home Publications Legal Studies

Keep in Touch

Twitter Icon
Follow Alt Law Journal on Facebook


Monash University Logo